This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Measurement

  • Online brand-building means no more click-through

    23 November 2012

    For most of its still-young life, online advertising has worshipped at the altar of the ‘almighty click-through’. If the click-through rate (CTR) was high, says the logic, the ad must have worked. After all, people wouldn’t have clicked on it otherwise.

    That might be true for ads designed to sell products and services and thus present an immediate return-on-investment (ROI), but it’s not quite as solid a measurement for brand-building. In fact, the lack of brand focus in the past has had a trickle-down impact on everyone involved in digital advertising, from the agency to networks to publishers.

    When the click-through rules the roost it drives everyone to the completely wrong side of the funnel, where they focus solely on price to improve ROI. Demand-side platforms (DSPs) and ad exchanges have become a breeding ground for cheap inventory and cookie bombing and, therefore, have alienated premium publishers from their buyers.

    But finally, the tide is turning and companies are beginning to seek standard metrics that matter for brands. Thankfully, new brand measures are being promoted by a few leading companies and are helping those companies take a stand on behalf of publishers – a platform to educate the market on the value of quality inventory and well-branded exposure, within context, to a target audience.

    Viewable impression measures, where the ‘success’ of an ad is based not on click-through rates but on its view-ability and clarity within the browser window, are taking off. They’re giving marketers a standardised view of these creative metrics that highlight exposure, view time, and engagement, and then benchmark those metrics against the industry, category, and creative format.

    Crucially, this information will give marketers the confidence to shift more spend to digital – because they demonstrate that brand-building can work just as well online as offline.

    And brand-building marketers need a relationship with a credible partner. When trying to measure view-ability via the DSP, ad exchange, or supply-side platform (SSP), rather than directly measuring viewable impressions in browser windows, there is often a massive loss of fidelity due to unfriendly iframes and multiple inventory hand-offs. With such a complex ecosystem of technology lying between the advertising brand and the publisher, accurate measurement is a must.

    Therefore, to truly measure the impact for marketers and understand the quality of the creative execution, brands need a mechanism that is executed within the ad server or directly from the publisher's page. Using that type of mechanism promotes equality among the inventory being purchased, empowering the buyer and seller with information that can be used to fairly judge price, quality, and effectiveness.

    The industry needs a better set of metrics, capable of demonstrating more than just click-through rates, if it wants to drive more brands to spend more of their budget with digital media. It’s even more important if it wants to generate a genuine quality approach.

    by Larry Allen, senior vice-president, business development at Real Media Group

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Measurement, Demand-side platforms, Measurement, ROI & effectiveness, Online advertising

  • The problem in the Middle East

    21 May 2012

    Last week I was invited to the Middle East Media Forum put on by Adnative. The briefing brought together an interesting mix of stakeholders from the Middle East who spoke about the opportunities in the region for advertisers and squashed some possible misguided assumptions about the population in the region.

    HSBC’s global head of media Suresh Balaji spoke about how to target the business elite in the Middle East and why marketers shouldn’t ignore the region. Online media owner Zawya and mobile specialists InMobi peddled their wares and banged the drum for digital in the Middle East – both talking a good game except for the fact that it was proudly announced at the beginning of the session that the Middle East is probably one of the few regions where print rules the roost. And, this is where the Middle East’s media problems lie.

    Attracting international advertisers to the Middle East is by no means a hard sell; the population in this region is educated, wealthy, have cash to splash and are receptive to advertising. Keeping the advertisers is where the issues begin. Why? Measurement.

    Despite the apparent love affair with print, a long-term relationship with audits and verified circulation numbers is yet to bloom. Which brings up that question which is well established in mature ad markets: ‘What is the return-on-investment?’ From what I heard; it is hard to find. To be fair, there are the EMS Middle East measurement numbers – but with a current frequency of every two years this is hardly anything to celebrate when it comes to delivering accountability.

    One Middle East media owner sitting in the audience, said by his own admission, that the region “needs to get better” when it comes to measurement and at offering clear ROI to potential advertisers. When he launched his magazine, he said, he put audit measures in place from day one – which drew criticism and scepticism from others in the region.

    In order to attract the international ad dollars they desire Middle East media owners need to communicate in the same language that international brands understand – the language of irrefutable numbers.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Measurement, Print, Measurement, ROI & effectiveness

  • No linear approach

    10 May 2011

    Unilever’s Luis di Como expressed his belief that there is “no linear approach” and that marketers should tackle multiple channels when planning campaigns.

    Speaking in the final session on content at the Festival of Media Global, di Como said: “We have lots of isolated tools around the globe to measure our campaigns but we need integrated systems.”

    He also believes that consumer will become more willing to give their data in exchanges for meaningful, personal experience as the industry tackles increasing scrutiny on handling data.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Josh Colley

    Tags: Measurement, Festival of Media Global