This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Online

  • Look who’s talking: understanding social influence online

    13 May 2013

    Do influencers really exist? Way back in 2000, when Facebook was but a twinkle in Mark Zuckerberg’s eye, Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point introduced the concept of “mavens”, the so-called super-consumers brands hungrily pursue as the Holy Grail of engagement. We all knew then that word of mouth was a powerful tool – but really, how influential could an individual be?

    Fast forward a few years and the quickly established social networking culture made this question rather more compelling. Brand strategists the world over have been devoting ever more energy converting the well-connected social networker into that fabled brand ambassador, whose views and endorsements send others rushing out to buy the latest products.

    Indeed, you can’t help but notice the number of brands attempting to target them explicitly, often in conjunction with services such as Klout and Peer Index. We’ve seen Cathay Pacific Airlines opening up its airport lounges to those with a strong influence score; Air New Zealand and Dell offering financial rewards to those whose recommendations lead to purchases from others; and, most recently, Ford looking to recruit 100 influencers for its “Social Remix” campaign.

    It’s also hard to avoid the numbers surrounding social networking. We may hear relentless about the supposed “death” of Facebook, but the truth remains that nearly two thirds of UK adults are classified as social networkers, with 45% saying that they “like” or “follow” brands. These figures are set to rise further; by the end of the 10s, around 75% will be using social platforms, with a jump to nearly 100% among the youngest tribes.

    Social influencers aren’t going anywhere in a hurry. And nor are brands’ attempts to isolate, categorise and engage them.

    The drunk guy at the party

    The problem is, there aren’t all that many brands doing it well – many are simply talking at their social audiences, something about as welcome as the drunk guy at a party; no-one wants them to be there, let alone listen to what they’re saying.

    It’s also too easy to under-estimate the potential of those not categorised as “super influencers”: 37% of consumers agree that they’re “always telling friends and family members about new services or products” they’ve discovered (rising to nearly 60% among those who follow brands on social networks). And another third neither agree nor disagree – suggesting they are at least sometimes recommending products. That makes for a lot of potential influencers.

    Why do we share?

    Status is a huge driver. When we ask networkers if they like it when other people endorse or share the content and posts they place online, around 60% say yes – a figure that climbs to 75% among 16-24s. This need for recognition is not new, nor is it exclusive to social networks – they have simply fuelled the desire to gain outward validation still further.

    We’re also increasingly selective about who we engage with and why. While the early days of Facebook mainly consisted of telling the world you were eating a ham sandwich or sharing 64 pictures of a fun party, apps like unbaby.me and Undrip are now springing up precisely to avoid this sort of unfiltered irrelevancy and implement a little more control. We are now much more likely to share on a one-to-one or one-to-a-few basis, broadcasting less and curating more. It’s all about showing your expertise.

    Due to this increasingly self-conscious approach to networking, a more thoughtful approach to social sharing is ripening and will undoubtedly characterise behaviours in the years ahead. In turn, we expect a greater number of consumers to adopt a digital etiquette routine when engaging in digital communications and to demand a greater level of quality in the content shared by their online contacts – whether individuals or brands. The focus will be on connections and messages that are genuinely relevant, entertaining, purposeful. Meanwhile, the thoughtless status update or branded intrusion will seem just as unwelcome as a piece of junk mail. And for those who subscribe to the super-consumer model of influence, it seems inescapable that these shifts and changes will shape the criteria by which influence is defined. Today’s super-influencers might simply be tomorrow’s drunk guys at the party.

    By Karen Canty, head of news, Future Foundation

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Social, Facebook

  • 2020: When online advertising meets mathematics

    22 April 2013

    A City or Wall Street worker of the 1980s who saw today’s financial markets would be, most likely, gobsmacked. For the most part, the ‘gut feels’ and instinct-based trading of yesteryear have been replaced by intricate computer-based financial modeling and statistical analysis.

    Similarly, looking ahead to the likely transactions, executions, insights and analytics of advertising buys of the year 2020, we see an equally seismic shift. Currently brands and advertisers are just scratching at the surface of what data has to offer. In seven years’ time, data – and its mathematical analysis – will rule the roost.

    By the year 2020, the skills of the ‘quant experts’ that financial markets have employed for many years will be used to transform the buying and selling of media. Sophisticated algorithms and forecast modeling will be widely used on both the demand and the supply sides, bringing down the cost of advertising and ensuring results will be quickly measurable. Gut feelings will give way to data provided in real time.  

    This type of forecasting, based on proven mathematical models, is the way of the future in digital media and is far superior to the ad-hoc sampling that is most prevalent in 2013. So what do brands and media agencies need to do now to prepare for this brave new world?

    The answer, of course, is data. Data is to media what location is to real estate. Simply put, it is the key right now to building an advertising environment that uses the amazing capabilities of algorithms to forecast and measure the value of every transaction.

    And so, media owners and advertisers should be taking steps right now to own all the data associated with their consumers. They need a safe, secure place to house that information, as well as the capabilities to derive insights and value from all facets and attributes associated with their business: audience profiles, device preferences and habits, environments, creative executions and performance. While at the same time, they need to educate consumers about the benefits of a more targeted, data-led approach and address their concerns – such as through initiatives like Your Online Choices

    In addition, we’re already seeing a significant level of fragmentation across multiple devices and this will only increase in the years ahead. As the industry grapples with the challenge of making money out of mobile and targeting consumers on multiple devices in meaningful and measureable ways, data and analytics become even more important. 

    The powerful combination of maths and data, algorithms and analysis, are critical to the three phases of advertising: pre-campaign forecasting and predicting; real time analysis of campaign effectiveness; and post campaign recommendations and insights. As the number and variety of attributes associated with all marketing campaigns continue to rise, and the measures of success on various devices diverge, the most advanced algorithms and analysis will be needed in order to define success. 

    By making mathematics and measurement - and data and analytics - central to their business today, publishers and advertisers will be set up for greater success in 2020. This means both also need to choose their partners wisely, as no company can hope to accomplish all this alone. Who, they should ask, can they trust to keep their data and their brand safe? 

    After all, many things will be different in 2020, but consumer trust in a brand will always be paramount. No amount of maths will change that.

    This article was originally developed for the Wharton Future of Advertising Program’s Advertising 2020 Project 2012-2013, wfoa.wharton.upenn.edu/ad2020

    By David J. Moore, chairman and chief executive, 24/7 Media

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Data, Online advertising

  • Why emotions are the key to a brand's social video success

    18 April 2013

    What makes a video become a YouTube sensation? What is it that makes people share some videos but not others? Unruly EMEA MD Phil Townend and leading academic Dr Karen Nelson-Field will answer these questions and many more about the secrets of social video success at the Festival of Media conference in Switzerland at the end of the month. Here is a sneak peek at what they will be talking about...

    The idea of predicting the success of a YouTube video before it is even launched may seem as far-fetched as guessing which new pop song will become the next No.1 hit.

    But new academic and scientific research into the psychology of video sharing has found that there is a formula to social video success.

    Studies into the emotions which drive people to share branded videos on the web have identified key, myth-busting trends for agencies and brands hoping to create contagious content on the web.

    At a time when content marketing is becoming a core part of the media mix, it means advertisers no longer need to possess Darth Vader’s skills to be able to foresee which ad will become the next The Force.

    But what are these consumer trends? And what are some of the common content myths around creating the next YouTube hit for brands?

    All will be revealed at the Festival of Media Global conference in Montreux on April 30.

    Unruly EMEA MD Phil Townend and leading academic Dr Karen Nelson-Field will take audience members in Switzerland through some of the latest key findings from recent academic research and brand case studies.

    These include:

    - The emotions which are most likely to inspire people to share a branded video;
    - Whether negative emotions (shock, disgust) can be just as powerful as positive emotions (humour, exhilaration) at driving people to share;
    - Why certain emotions are effective in one vertical but not another;
    - Whether the level of branding in a video has any effect on sharing;
    - Which emotions are most likely to lead to brand recall.

    Nelson-Field will even give a tantalising glimpse at some of the key points from her new book, Viral Marketing: The Science of Sharing, due to be released later this year.

    Phil's and Karen's 25-minute presentation 'What Makes Good Content?' is due to start at 12.15pm on April 30. To add the event to your calendar, click here. Book your place here.

    By David Waterhouse (this post was spotted on the Unruly Media blog)

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Social, Video, Festival of Media Global

  • What does the future hold for TV?

    08 April 2013

    There has been a real buzz about online video advertising as TV moves into a digitally connected world. I caught up with some of the leading experts on the convergence between TV and online video and discussed the changing landscape of AV advertising and asked how programmatic trading is revolutionising how media is bought and sold.

    Daniel Knapp, Director of Advertising Research at IHS, points out that while there has been two crises in the advertising industry in the last three years, the TV industry has had no such crisis and has remained stable. This has been coupled with the seismic shift in audience consumption away from linear content to DVR and across multiple devise - 15% across tablets and mobiles. Online video for broadcasters has been a good way for broadcasters to diversify, and the majority of online video has been ad funded. There has also been a shift from the way advertising has been traded towards programmatic trading, and he predicted that by 2016 all online display advertising including online would be traded programmatically across the board.

    Anthony Rhind, former co-CEO of Havas Digital, makes the point that technology's role is getting beyond the constraints of human capacity. He implored the industry to let technology manage volume and speed, but also take into account human instinct. He points out that brands are built through awareness, reputation and consideration and notes that there has been a lot of chat about whether RTB delivers higher CPMs. In TV we have a huge opportunity, but the question is just how quickly will the take up be?

    Chris Locke, UK Trading Director of Starcom Mediavest Group, says that we will get to a model that combines targeted online advertising at scale with fame spots on TV. Other media can do scalability in RTB better. Ad sales is all about long term relationships and RTB is traded on short term relationships. We also need to take into account the social aspects of TV. RTB could be used on second devices rather than second screen, where there is no real data. Advertisers are not moving fast into the video space as they want to sell it at a premium. Chris points out that as a medium, advertisers would want to monetise their off peak.

    David Fisher, Head of Futures at Sky feels that targeted audiences will mirror planned audiences in programmatic TV advertising. Adsmart, launching in August, will be bringing targeted advertising to linear TV. It is supply side and has technical capabilities and encompasses the long journey to programmatically trade linear TV. David feels that in the VOD world it will happen sooner.

    Richard Wheaton, Managing Director of Neo@Ogilvy, says that it is agencies that are bringing in innovation and capabilities to the debate - brands are not asking for this. "Programmatic" should be called "insight" as it delivers layers of information. Richard feels that the term undervalues the value of agencies. He also points out that all media is digital these days and all the lessons we learned from digital are now applicable to TV.

    What we need to ask ourselves is the time right for TV and online to converge?

    By Andrew Moore, EMEA managing director, SpotXchange

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, real time bidding, TV, Video

  • Harlem Shake vs Gangnam Style: the ultimate Twitter showdown

    20 March 2013

    Harlem Shake and Gangnam Style – if I’ve lost you already then I’ve only got one thing to say: Where have you been hiding for the last year?! Both have taken the world of online video and social media by storm, and if you’re anything like me you can’t help but start bopping your head as soon as you hear either tune start playing.

    It’s great that these YouTube phenomenons have seen massive global success in such a short space of time and this new, interesting infographic from Ghergich & Co used Twitter data to compare how both were picked up in social media in the first 30 days after launch.

    After comparing the total number of tweets, positive and negative reactions, tweets by country, total exposure and the peak performance, the team at Ghergich managed to pull together this pretty cool infographic comparing the two. Can you guess who came out on top? Scroll to the bottom for the winner – you might be surprised!

    Harlem Shake Vs Gangnam Style Ultimate Twitter Showdown
    Infographic by Ghergich & Co.

    And for those who still have no idea what I'm on about, check out the videos below:

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Twitter, Social Media, Online, Social, Video

  • What makes a category champion and why are they important for your brand’s health?

    19 February 2013

    For any given category you will find different types of influencers – people that others listen to and can have an impact on consumer brand choices. There are Connectors who have a wide network of people they talk to, Mavens who know a lot about their subject and are willing to share that information with others and Sales People who, because of their knowledge, are able to convince others. But the ultimate group of super charged influencers are the Champions who display the characteristics of all the above. Get close to these people and a brand can have a powerful force on its behalf, multiplying the impact of its ad spend.

    The latest research conducted for the inTV group, by InSites Consulting, measured the power of conversations across six brand categories (Banking/Finance, Travel Destinations, Tablets/Smartphones, Watches, Cars, Airlines) focusing on the big five European markets (UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain).

    The research showed that Champions vary by category and some are more elusive than others. Travel Champions are the most prevalent, with 8.3% of the 1,600 surveyed being identified as such, whereas watch Champions were harder to find at only 1.4% of the survey.

    And not all Champions are the same; for example, as far as I’m concerned a car is a means of transport that gets you from A to B and which come in a range of different colors – end of story. However, when it comes to smartphones I have done my research, I have very specific opinions and I am not afraid to share them – including a Twitter tirade last year when my phone died and service levels were sub-standard.

    As a woman, I find it somewhat depressing to report that females do not make particularly good category Champions.  Overall only 35% of women classify as category Champions. This is worst for the car category at only 19% women, (which means I am helping to fulfill that particular stereotype) and best in the travel category with 48% being female. 

    There are also differences between the age and income profile of category Champions. Banking/Finance Champions tended towards the mature end of the scale and Smartphone Champions are more youthful (I would like to say that I fulfill this stereotype but my birth certificate disagrees).

    Income also plays an important role; almost 70% of all category brand Champions were within the top 20% of income earners – this was most important for the watch category where 86% were in the upper income bracket.

    However, the single element we found that had the greatest impact on whether an individual was classified as a category Champion or not – was their choice of TV channels. The inTV group is made up of independent international TV channels.  People choose to watch these channels, in whichever country they happen to be in, have made an active choice to watch a channel outside of the mainstream, the programming is largely factually based (something Champions love) and the channel provides them with an alternative, more international view point (again a big bonus for Champions). International TV viewers are four times more likely to be an airline Champion, 2 ½ times more likely to be a banking Champion and over 6 ½ times to be a watch Champion!

    The in-depth research study also told us:

    • - Which brands consumers love to talk about most? (14% of respondents had been talking about my smartphone brand - which I have forgiven since the debacle of last year)
    • - Identified what tone of voice consumers use across different categories?
    • - How Champions can move your brand down the purchase funnel. 

     

    Check out the full presentation on SlideShare or talk to anyone of the member channels, who are: BBC World News, France 24, ESPN Classic, Euronews, Eurosport, National Geographic, Sky News, CNBC and TV5 Monde

    By Belinda Barker, director at BSBMedia, chairperson of the inTV Group

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Social, Branding

  • The price of love this Valentine’s Day

    13 February 2013

    As the world prepares itself to ‘feel the love’ this Valentine’s Day, retailers don’t want to miss out on getting a piece of the action. Timely then that e-commerce marketplace Rakuten has just released this infographic which explores the rise of online shopping around this global occasion. After all, retailers deserve a bit of that ‘loving feeling’.

    The research found that online sales in the US and UK have continued to rise year-on-year in the run up to Valentine’s Day with a significant spike the week before February 14, each year (last minute shoppers!) But there are so many different consumer trends across the globe, which I think this infographic illustrates beautifully.

    US consumers are a little more prepared that their UK counterparts, with jewellery sales peaking on February 3 versus February 8. In France, there was a 52% rise in flower sales in the run-up to Valentine’s Day and UK consumers saw a 27% year-on-year increase in sales in 2012.

    It seems consumers in Asia value their nearest and dearest more than anywhere else in the world, with an average spend per person on Valentine’s gifts of $269, followed by Spain ($235), France and the UK (both $185). At the other end of the scale, Germany came in lowest at just $92 per person, with Italy just ahead at $97.

    “Valentine’s Day continues to be another significant event for retailers, whether online or bricks-and-mortar,” says Rakuten’s Play.com marketing director Adam Stewart. “With sales online continuing to increase year-on-year, it’s important that retailers are ready to take advantage of the opportunity this offers them to engage with shoppers, whether this means offering a special deals, dedicated Valentine’s sections to your online store, or guaranteed next day delivery for those slightly more last minute shoppers. Through understanding their customers shopping habits and offering a great, personalised experience, retailers, and merchants can make sure they are feeling the love this Valentine’s Day too.”

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Online, E-commerce, Shopping

  • The challenges we face working in digital

    29 January 2013

    Working in digital is fast-paced, exciting and very fulfilling. But like all industries there are annoyances we deal with on a day-to-day basis that slow us down and downright frustrate us.

    The below highlights a few examples I could think of and some advice on how to get past these issues and start getting results for your client/business.


    Getting access to client technology platforms (eg. web analytics)

    Despite access to data being essential when running a media campaign, many clients will claim they are not allowed to give an agency access to a web analytics platform or similar due to a policy a bureaucrat at HQ came up with years ago.

    Thankfully this problem is becoming less and less of an issue – clients are becoming increasingly savvy and understand that they need to share data with their agencies. I generally only have problems with international and finance clients who are particularly paranoid about sharing data.

    You also need to watch out for businesses using Adobe Omniture. Sometimes getting access to data (eg. Adobe Discover) is challenging due to licensing issues.

    The Solution

    The benefit of an agency having direct access to analytics is far greater than any downside the client might invent. Agencies need to make it clear that being able to access data quickly is important for optimisation. It might be useful to remind a client that having simple “user access” to a web analytics account means no settings can be changed / damage can be done.

    If the client can’t share logins due to licensing issues (particularly annoying with Adobe solutions) I propose using the same login as the client but ensure you aren’t using it at the same time. There’s no sense in paying twice to get another login.


    The EU Cookie Law

    When I first heard about the EU Cookie law I went a bit mad. It sounded like a total waste of everybody’s time. Not only would it involve our clients investing more money in building mechanisms to inform visitors about cookies, but also it would require legal teams to look over the law and provide bespoke advice for different markets (and nobody likes getting legal teams involved!). A poor implementation could also ruin a client’s data quality and conversion rate.

    From what I can tell, people still don’t care about the Cookie Law. You only have to browse the web for a few minutes to discover many large companies that have not implemented any form of cookie information mechanism. We’ve also looked into data from a client that has implemented a cookie mechanism that showed that only 0.03% of people decided to opt out. I’m willing to bet most of those opt outs were just our team testing if it works…

    The Solution

    [Full disclaimer – I can’t provide legal advice so this is just my opinion]

    By all means provide transparent information about which cookies you use on your website, but do not make a big fuss of it on the homepage. I’d try and be as subtle as possible with the messaging as most people will ignore it anyway.

    Definitely go for an “implied opt in” approach. This means that cookies will be dropped without the user having to press an opt in button and your data doesn’t become invalid.

     
    Google’s Monopoly makes measuring SEO performance difficult

    Google can do whatever they want and we have to like it – that’s the downside of their huge monopoly on the search market. I used to work in our SEO team and am glad I don’t anymore as recent changes to Google have made it difficult to measure success and make accurate forecasts as to what ROI can be delivered.

    I’m talking about “Not Provided” keywords appearing in web analytics reports. If you’re logged into a Google account when you run a search query on Google you will be using Google’s secure search (https://). What this will do is hide the search query used to arrive at a website so the client (or agency) is unable to know which keywords have been performing well.

    We’ve already started to see the industry devolve to the stage where search engine ranking for “vanity keywords” is becoming the main KPI with many clients. It’s embarrassing; I thought we left this method behind last decade?

    The Solution

    I have seen many solutions on other blogs on how to overcome the “not provided” challenge – but I think it’s sad – SEOs are fighting a losing fight. We’ve created models to understand what keywords “not provided” might actually be but it’s only a matter of time before there will be no data at all to work with.

    Using Google Webmastertools to better understand visibility is an OK alternative. I personally think the tool is pretty basic but we have to work with what we have. This tool will show you average search engine ranking (accounting for personalised results) as well as click-through-rate on your top keywords.

    A dashboard is generally not the solution

    What I’ve realised over the past year is that 99% of clients that ask for dashboards, don’t actually need a dashboard. It frustrates me that we have to show off a dashboard solution in every pitch – because we know every other agency is doing the same thing and we can’t risk ignoring the question.

    The sad truth is that a dashboard is not always going to help optimise a campaign and I feel as an industry we need to move away from this “dashboard is the solution” mentality.

    Let’s go back to the drawing board.

    A dashboard is something that sits behind the wheel of your car telling you how fast you are going and if you need more fuel. The dashboards our clients request today are essentially fully blown web analytics tools, not dashboards!

    The Solution

    We will always need to provide dashboards to show off performance – it helps us win business. I do think we need to start promoting a model where clients buy into people as well as dashboards.

    A client will get far more insight from a person performing analysis on their data, than a mega dashboard that ends up being used by nobody in their business.

    We have a team of web analysts that work across our client accounts and it seems to work well. Client’s are benefiting from rich insight and actually have somebody telling them what action to take with their data.

    By Carl Fernandes, head of analytics and conversion, iProspect

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Digital, Search, Google

  • Facebook Graph Search: On top? Or a flop?

    16 January 2013

    We’ve been waiting long enough and now Facebook has finally given us something optimistic to talk about for the first time since its disastrous IPO last year. 

    What happened?

    It’s all over the news and if you haven’t heard by now then where have you been hiding? For those that have been travelling on a long-haul WiFi-less flight (that’s the only way you could have missed it), here’s the news in short:

    The tech world had been speculating for some time about a big Facebook announcement, which came last night during a press conference in California. Rumours were rife around what the social networking giant could have up its sleeve – was it the launch of a new smartphone? An ad platform? A search engine? Who knew...

    Until now that is.

    In what might initially have come as a blow to Google, Facebook has launched its own search engine, Graph Search. But it’s not what it first seems. In the words of Zuckerberg: “Graph Search is not web search”. Phew for Google! Rather than taking on the internet king of search that is Google, it’s an internal search engine unique to Facebook that brings its own unique social networking element to search – which sounds like more of a Siri-style function than a Google.

    What is it?

    Making the big announcement last night, Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg described the latest feature as the social network’s “third pillar”, after the newsfeed and timeline. 

    It works by allowing users to search for people, photos, places and interests by typing in a search term, which could be as random as: ‘people who like cycling’, ‘sushi restaurants in New York’, ‘jewellery that my friends like’ or ‘which smartphone should I buy’. Facebook will then trawl through its vast amounts of data across profiles, photos and pages to bring up search results based on the recommendations or personal interests of friends or connections.

    Ah-ha, I hear you say. Well what happens if Facebook doesn’t have the information that you search for? Well that’s where Microsoft comes in (an early investor in Facebook one of Google’s largest challengers). If a user searches a term that goes beyond Facebook’s capabilities, they will be directed to Bing for wider web searches. Result for Microsoft!

    Why does it matter?

    Facebook has one billion users, over 240 billion photos and a never ending number of connections – every advertiser's dream. It’s about time the social network did something meaningful with its resources.

    For Facebook (which will be music to the ears of Facebook investors), it opens up a whole new ad revenue stream – something which Facebook has been struggling with since its IPO back in May last year. Before this, Facebook’s search function was basic and pretty much a wasted opportunity in terms of advertising.

    Since Facebook announced that whopping one billion user milestone last year, the social network has been on a downward spiral – with users not adding many new friends/connections, resulting in a static social graph: Facebook’s worst nightmare. But with Graph Search, users are encouraged to add more friends, spend more time on the site and keep coming back – something that is vital to Facebook’s success.

    For advertisers, this is good news in terms of engaging with consumers on a more personal level. Glow chief executive Damian Routley makes a good point that for most people, the most trusted reviews and recommendations come from those closest to you. “That’s the value that Facebook brings to search and that’s why it will be a serious contender in this market,” he says.

    What does it all mean?

    It could give Facebook a chance to truly increase its ad revenues. Google currently commands around 66.7% share of the search market in the US, according to Comscore, and it’s about time someone else got in on the game too.

    Rocket Fuel’s managing director Europe Dominic Trigg is of the view that the new feature should bring together search and rich display together – “something we haven’t really seen before at the scale that Facebook can offer”.

    “This means the ability to better engage users when they are searching, but also to target messages more precisely so that users see advertising that is relevant to them,” says Trigg. “All this serves to increase Facebook's attractiveness to advertisers.”

    Brands listen up – if you haven’t got a Facebook Page already in place, you better get cracking. And for those who do – it’s time to optimise your site, page, app... everything! Advertisers might have the opportunity to truly tap into that much sought-after one billion user base.

    Click here for more information about Graph Search and how it works.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Online, Advertising, Facebook, Search

  • RTB in Europe: 2012 in review

    09 January 2013

    2012 was the year that online advertising through real-time bidding (RTB) really started to take off in Europe with more and more big brands deciding to get on board with it. So much so, that the guys over at Infectious Media have pulled together a load of stats to create an infographic which gives you a round-up of all RTB activity in Europe during 2012, along with some predictions for what's in store for 2013. Check it out:

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Online, real time bidding, Online advertising

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Next page