This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Search

  • The challenges we face working in digital

    29 January 2013

    Working in digital is fast-paced, exciting and very fulfilling. But like all industries there are annoyances we deal with on a day-to-day basis that slow us down and downright frustrate us.

    The below highlights a few examples I could think of and some advice on how to get past these issues and start getting results for your client/business.


    Getting access to client technology platforms (eg. web analytics)

    Despite access to data being essential when running a media campaign, many clients will claim they are not allowed to give an agency access to a web analytics platform or similar due to a policy a bureaucrat at HQ came up with years ago.

    Thankfully this problem is becoming less and less of an issue – clients are becoming increasingly savvy and understand that they need to share data with their agencies. I generally only have problems with international and finance clients who are particularly paranoid about sharing data.

    You also need to watch out for businesses using Adobe Omniture. Sometimes getting access to data (eg. Adobe Discover) is challenging due to licensing issues.

    The Solution

    The benefit of an agency having direct access to analytics is far greater than any downside the client might invent. Agencies need to make it clear that being able to access data quickly is important for optimisation. It might be useful to remind a client that having simple “user access” to a web analytics account means no settings can be changed / damage can be done.

    If the client can’t share logins due to licensing issues (particularly annoying with Adobe solutions) I propose using the same login as the client but ensure you aren’t using it at the same time. There’s no sense in paying twice to get another login.


    The EU Cookie Law

    When I first heard about the EU Cookie law I went a bit mad. It sounded like a total waste of everybody’s time. Not only would it involve our clients investing more money in building mechanisms to inform visitors about cookies, but also it would require legal teams to look over the law and provide bespoke advice for different markets (and nobody likes getting legal teams involved!). A poor implementation could also ruin a client’s data quality and conversion rate.

    From what I can tell, people still don’t care about the Cookie Law. You only have to browse the web for a few minutes to discover many large companies that have not implemented any form of cookie information mechanism. We’ve also looked into data from a client that has implemented a cookie mechanism that showed that only 0.03% of people decided to opt out. I’m willing to bet most of those opt outs were just our team testing if it works…

    The Solution

    [Full disclaimer – I can’t provide legal advice so this is just my opinion]

    By all means provide transparent information about which cookies you use on your website, but do not make a big fuss of it on the homepage. I’d try and be as subtle as possible with the messaging as most people will ignore it anyway.

    Definitely go for an “implied opt in” approach. This means that cookies will be dropped without the user having to press an opt in button and your data doesn’t become invalid.

     
    Google’s Monopoly makes measuring SEO performance difficult

    Google can do whatever they want and we have to like it – that’s the downside of their huge monopoly on the search market. I used to work in our SEO team and am glad I don’t anymore as recent changes to Google have made it difficult to measure success and make accurate forecasts as to what ROI can be delivered.

    I’m talking about “Not Provided” keywords appearing in web analytics reports. If you’re logged into a Google account when you run a search query on Google you will be using Google’s secure search (https://). What this will do is hide the search query used to arrive at a website so the client (or agency) is unable to know which keywords have been performing well.

    We’ve already started to see the industry devolve to the stage where search engine ranking for “vanity keywords” is becoming the main KPI with many clients. It’s embarrassing; I thought we left this method behind last decade?

    The Solution

    I have seen many solutions on other blogs on how to overcome the “not provided” challenge – but I think it’s sad – SEOs are fighting a losing fight. We’ve created models to understand what keywords “not provided” might actually be but it’s only a matter of time before there will be no data at all to work with.

    Using Google Webmastertools to better understand visibility is an OK alternative. I personally think the tool is pretty basic but we have to work with what we have. This tool will show you average search engine ranking (accounting for personalised results) as well as click-through-rate on your top keywords.

    A dashboard is generally not the solution

    What I’ve realised over the past year is that 99% of clients that ask for dashboards, don’t actually need a dashboard. It frustrates me that we have to show off a dashboard solution in every pitch – because we know every other agency is doing the same thing and we can’t risk ignoring the question.

    The sad truth is that a dashboard is not always going to help optimise a campaign and I feel as an industry we need to move away from this “dashboard is the solution” mentality.

    Let’s go back to the drawing board.

    A dashboard is something that sits behind the wheel of your car telling you how fast you are going and if you need more fuel. The dashboards our clients request today are essentially fully blown web analytics tools, not dashboards!

    The Solution

    We will always need to provide dashboards to show off performance – it helps us win business. I do think we need to start promoting a model where clients buy into people as well as dashboards.

    A client will get far more insight from a person performing analysis on their data, than a mega dashboard that ends up being used by nobody in their business.

    We have a team of web analysts that work across our client accounts and it seems to work well. Client’s are benefiting from rich insight and actually have somebody telling them what action to take with their data.

    By Carl Fernandes, head of analytics and conversion, iProspect

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Digital, Search, Google

  • Facebook Graph Search: On top? Or a flop?

    16 January 2013

    We’ve been waiting long enough and now Facebook has finally given us something optimistic to talk about for the first time since its disastrous IPO last year. 

    What happened?

    It’s all over the news and if you haven’t heard by now then where have you been hiding? For those that have been travelling on a long-haul WiFi-less flight (that’s the only way you could have missed it), here’s the news in short:

    The tech world had been speculating for some time about a big Facebook announcement, which came last night during a press conference in California. Rumours were rife around what the social networking giant could have up its sleeve – was it the launch of a new smartphone? An ad platform? A search engine? Who knew...

    Until now that is.

    In what might initially have come as a blow to Google, Facebook has launched its own search engine, Graph Search. But it’s not what it first seems. In the words of Zuckerberg: “Graph Search is not web search”. Phew for Google! Rather than taking on the internet king of search that is Google, it’s an internal search engine unique to Facebook that brings its own unique social networking element to search – which sounds like more of a Siri-style function than a Google.

    What is it?

    Making the big announcement last night, Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg described the latest feature as the social network’s “third pillar”, after the newsfeed and timeline. 

    It works by allowing users to search for people, photos, places and interests by typing in a search term, which could be as random as: ‘people who like cycling’, ‘sushi restaurants in New York’, ‘jewellery that my friends like’ or ‘which smartphone should I buy’. Facebook will then trawl through its vast amounts of data across profiles, photos and pages to bring up search results based on the recommendations or personal interests of friends or connections.

    Ah-ha, I hear you say. Well what happens if Facebook doesn’t have the information that you search for? Well that’s where Microsoft comes in (an early investor in Facebook one of Google’s largest challengers). If a user searches a term that goes beyond Facebook’s capabilities, they will be directed to Bing for wider web searches. Result for Microsoft!

    Why does it matter?

    Facebook has one billion users, over 240 billion photos and a never ending number of connections – every advertiser's dream. It’s about time the social network did something meaningful with its resources.

    For Facebook (which will be music to the ears of Facebook investors), it opens up a whole new ad revenue stream – something which Facebook has been struggling with since its IPO back in May last year. Before this, Facebook’s search function was basic and pretty much a wasted opportunity in terms of advertising.

    Since Facebook announced that whopping one billion user milestone last year, the social network has been on a downward spiral – with users not adding many new friends/connections, resulting in a static social graph: Facebook’s worst nightmare. But with Graph Search, users are encouraged to add more friends, spend more time on the site and keep coming back – something that is vital to Facebook’s success.

    For advertisers, this is good news in terms of engaging with consumers on a more personal level. Glow chief executive Damian Routley makes a good point that for most people, the most trusted reviews and recommendations come from those closest to you. “That’s the value that Facebook brings to search and that’s why it will be a serious contender in this market,” he says.

    What does it all mean?

    It could give Facebook a chance to truly increase its ad revenues. Google currently commands around 66.7% share of the search market in the US, according to Comscore, and it’s about time someone else got in on the game too.

    Rocket Fuel’s managing director Europe Dominic Trigg is of the view that the new feature should bring together search and rich display together – “something we haven’t really seen before at the scale that Facebook can offer”.

    “This means the ability to better engage users when they are searching, but also to target messages more precisely so that users see advertising that is relevant to them,” says Trigg. “All this serves to increase Facebook's attractiveness to advertisers.”

    Brands listen up – if you haven’t got a Facebook Page already in place, you better get cracking. And for those who do – it’s time to optimise your site, page, app... everything! Advertisers might have the opportunity to truly tap into that much sought-after one billion user base.

    Click here for more information about Graph Search and how it works.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Online, Advertising, Facebook, Search

  • What’s the most searched-for term of 2012?

    03 December 2012

    In what has been a year we’ll remember for football, Fifty Shades of Grey, the iPhone 5, Felix Baumgartner’s 24-mile space jump, and news of Kate Middleton and Prince William expecting a royal baby, can you guess what the most searched-for term of the year was in the UK across the Yahoo search engine?

    While 2012 will stick out in our minds as a year full of many great events, it was in fact a little old event some might remember called the London 2012 Olympics that caught the nation’s imagination in 2012.

    According to the Yahoo UK Year in Review for 2012, the Olympics trumped everything else in terms of the volume of online searches and news. We’ve pulled out a few of our favourite top ten searches to give you an idea of just what Brits are looking for when they go online...

    The top ten of everything in 2012

    1. Olympics

    2. Liverpool FC

    3. Kindle

    4. Manchester United

    5. Kate Middleton

    6. iPad

    7. Formula 1

    8. Eastenders

    9. iPhone 5

    10. Arsenal

     

    Top ten celebs (2011 place in brackets)

    1. Kate Middleton (#3)

    2. Tulisa Contostavlos

    3. Cheryl Cole (#1)

    4. Kim Kardashian (#10)

    5. Robin Gibb

    6. One Direction

    7. Prince Harry

    8. Whitney Houston

    9. Rhianna (#10)

    10. Holly Willoughby (#14)

     

    Top kids searches

    1. Moshi Monsters

    2. Binweevils

    3. Club Penguin

    4. MyMaths

    5. Lego

    6. Disney Superbia

    7. Mathletics

    8. Ben 10

    9. Peppa Pig

    10. Pokémon

     

    Top mobile searches

    1. Olympics

    2. iPhone 5

    3. Premier League

    4. Liverpool FC

    5. Manchester United

    6. Fifty Shades of Grey

    7. April Jones

    8. Euro 2012

    9. Wimbledon

    10. Leeds United

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Online, Search

  • Five top tips for optimising international SEO

    28 November 2011

    Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) strategy for international brands can be a minefield. Without strategic, careful planning, brands can quickly find themselves exponentially overwhelmed. Multiple languages, multiple websites, multiple website platforms and even multiple alphabets conspire to make SEO across borders a difficult proposition. Consider these best practices for international SEO:

    Favour strategies that span borders

    If your strategy works without having to be tailored by market, that’s great! For instance, if you are working to improve visibility in several countries, and each country’s site is built on the same platform, look to optimise that platform first. For example, is it possible to improve overall site speed? Serving page resources from multiple hostnames would mean browsers downloading resources in parallel, boosting the speed of your sites significantly – with only one global change rather than a change per market.

    Ensure your SEO strategies are easy to understand

    International SEO typically includes more stakeholders, which can lead to confusion. Individual territories will have their own marketing managers with differing levels of SEO understanding. It is imperative to work with your SEO agency to communicate brand strategy with consistency and clarity. Distil plans into simple concepts that anyone in your organisation can understand.

    Produce Immediate Results

    Implementing SEO in several markets at once usually leads to roadblocks that hinder immediate results. If there is an opportunity to make an instant impact – take it! Bulk upload of stores to Google Places is a great example. It pretty much guarantees visibility on the SERPs for relevant geographical keywords in return for a bit of excel formatting with the brand’s store details.

    Minimise Local Resources

    Set a central strategy with your marketing team and SEO agency, and then ask team members in local markets to implement the strategies that directly apply to and benefit their market. Work with your SEO agency to prioritise work that can benefit your company's local people and then create standardized, repeatable processes to ensure local teams will do work that is applicable to them.

    Establish Brand / Agency relationships

    Introduce your SEO agency to appropriate teams within your company. Set ground rules, build trust, then cultivate a partnership so as programs develop and time constraints arise, the agency can go straight to the source for increased efficiency. This also enables you to focus on the big picture and keeps the minutiae to the relevant people in your organisation and agency.

    Richard Kirk is head of SEO strategy for Publicis Groupe’s Performics

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Online, Search

  • Hands up, who knows what SEO means?

    07 September 2011

    By Andrew Whitehair, managing director, Razsor 

     

    The internet is now so much part of our daily lives that we might sometimes forget how it has revolutionised the way we do business and the way we run our personal lives. Consumers have become increasingly connected and web-savvy, able to connect with brands through their computer, mobile or tablet device on their own terms. In order to be successful it’s important for brands to understand the digital world and its language. To help marketers starting out on this journey, here are some of the most regularly used terms in digital marketing that all too often aren’t explained:

    SEO: To drive customers to a brand’s website, ‘Search Engine Optimisation’, or SEO, is vital.  SEO is a process of improving visibility of a website in search engines, such as Google or Bing, via natural or unpaid search results. SEO considers what terms people search for and optimises a website and its content to increase its relevance to the keywords that individuals are searching on most frequently. This allows browsers to find and rank such websites higher than millions of other sites in response to a specific search query.

    Keywords: A great way to boost SEO rankings is to closely match words on your website, which mirror those a potential customer will use when searching for a product or service online. These words are known as ‘keywords’. Keywords need to be specific and chosen carefully, as if too many keywords are chosen you will dilute their significance and the impact on your search ranking. Relevant keywords should be included in the title of your website as well as in your description tag, as these are the first places the search engine will scan before indexing results and ranking them on its search pages.

    PPC: Pay per click (PPC) is a method of paying for response from search engines or social networks, where advertisers pay publishers for each click an advert receives. PPC is intended to drive traffic to your website by placing display advertisements on key segments of a site or on top of keywords  – by placing a hyperlink on the word ‘car’ in an editorial article on a website visited by your target audience. PPC is an easier, but more expensive form of SEO and should only be used to fill in gaps in existing marketing and advertising strategies.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Online, Online advertising, Search

  • SEO: Google’s Organic Search Sitelinks Offer Brands More Online Visibility

    30 August 2011

    by Doug Platts

    Brand marketers cannot afford to be passive in their online marketing efforts in today’s search culture. One of the most important aspects of today’s online marketing is in the search engine results page (SERP). Google Sitelinks are arguably the best feature to come to the search engine results page (SERP) for brands in the past 5 years. The evolution and growth of Sitelinks has been especially interesting for brand marketers to watch, and the latest changes to Sitelinks offers a very real chance for your brand to directly benefit in a big way.

    We cheered when they first appeared and for the most part cheered louder and louder up through where we stand today. The cheering came mostly out of the excitement stemming from being able to affect brand search results to some degree. The latest changes have given brands the gift of dominating the SERP for searches on their brand name.

     

    WHAT’S NEW

    Google rolled out an update, on August 16th, to the layout of Sitelinks as they appear within SERPs. These changes include:

    • The number of Sitelinks has also increased from a maximum of 8 to 12.
    • Sitelinks increased in size and now have snippets including a brief description and URL.
    • More pages are eligible. No longer limits Sitelink-eligible pages to those that are 1 directory off the root directory. Many more pages are now potential Sitelinks.
    • The amount of space given to a site within SERPs for branded searches has greatly increased with this change (iCrossing expects to see increased click-through rates for brand terms as a result of this change)

    12-PACK IMPACT
    In this situation less is not more. More is more.

    Until recently, the only pages that were eligible to be Sitelinks were pages that were pages 1 level down from the root directory. This blocked the possibility of seeing product-level pages appear as Sitelinks. This can get a site visitor deeper into your site where the majority of conversions occur.

    Users now have more options within your brand’s set of Sitelinks. A variety of additional mid-level pages can now appear as Sitelinks, which can be a strategic way to guide users toward category-level pages when these pages have proven to be strong performers.

    Internal Linking is now more important than ever. Descriptive naming conventions within anchor text and link attributes will be even more important to ensure accurate, useful Sitelinks.

    Search engines use your internal linking to determine the names of Sitelink results by determining what anchor text is used to point to the Sitelink-eligible pages. So if a Sitelink is appearing for a page you’d like to be featured but the title isn’t what you’d prefer, then look at your universal navigation files and modify the related anchor text in those files.

    Reputation Management is another business element that can be affected by smart use of Sitelinks. One application of this concept is to allow your site’s main Customer Service page to remain eligible as a Sitelink by not demoting it. If the Customer Service page is already a live Sitelink, you may want to keep it there. Sure, it’ll cost you one of the 12 Sitelink slots where you otherwise could feature a conversion-friendly page, but giving users easy access to customer service will win you some favor.

    It’s common to hear that people are fed-up by how difficult it is to find out how to contact a brand. Be the exception, sacrifice a Sitelink, and have a competent customer service staff to win over users for the long-term.

     

    Not getting your full brand coverage

    Whilst these new Sitelinks are appear for the majority of brands there are still some instances of where they are not appear, Where we have noticed this is when there is more than one domain that could be the primary brand domain for that query.

    For example DKNY has multiple domains, and so far Google has not determined which is the right brand domain to display Sitelinks for:

    Hugo Boss on the other hand does have the site links as there is no confusion

    Similarly where there is ambiguity around whether the search query is a brand term or not, for example ‘mac’ could be either the makeup brand or the Apple product

     

    I’m sure as Google analysis click-through data it will start to refine this updated and single out specific domains.

     

    WHAT YOU CAN CONTROL
    Brand marketers cannot control all aspects of Sitelinks, but Google does give us the ability to essentially block, or “demote,” specific pages from appearing as Sitelinks.

    Your Google Webmaster Tools account (sign-up here) gives you access to a list of pages from your site Google considers eligible to be a Sitelink. Even though you cannot choose which pages will appear, you can affect which page will not appear.

    In the past, Google has had the policy of allowing one block per page without the possibility of reinstatement. That no longer is the case as demotions can be turned off to allow the page to once again be eligible to appear as a Sitelink. This is an excellent opportunity to take advantage of seasonality changes in the popularity of your pages. While you can’t explicitly choose a Sitelink, you can demote pages that aren’t vital to your business goals in the current season. Google doesn’t guarantee that it will follow your wishes, and it can take time to see the changes live in search results, so we don’t recommend making drastic changes on a frequent basis.

     

    EARLY RESULTS
    Here at iCrossing, we’ve taken a look at the brands of our clients to see if more or less traffic is going to their sites from search engines since the change to Sitelinks, and they are definitely showing a significant uplift in organic click-throughs for traffic across the board.

    Any increase in organic search traffic begs the question of how branded PPC results might be affected by this change. Initial iCrossing PPC findings are forthcoming soon, but you should consider the specifics of your current  branded efforts and evaluate performance before and after this launch.

    Traffic increases are great, we’re all for them, but these surges don’t mean much if a quality site experience is missing on the other side of the click. Trends such as Google Sitelinks still require foundational best practices for your brand’s website. Take some time to examine the user experience on the pages that are eligible to appear as Sitelinks. Some fine tuning could unclog the pipes of traffic coming your way.

    Sitelinks should give you a great start by getting users to deeper pages more quickly, but it’s (as always) up to you to close the deal.

    This post was written by Doug Platts, head of Natural Search at iCrossing.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Online advertising, Search, Google

  • Walking on the Bing side

    08 July 2011

    I still remember the day that I was introduced to the world of Google. I was in high school and my English teacher took us all down to the library to show us how to do research online. She showed us Google and instructed us to use it when looking for anything online and from there my Google addiction began. I now have a Gmail account, use Google Maps on my phone, use Google analytics to track what I publish online and most importantly still exclusively use Google for search.

    This week that all changed.

    I am still not 100% sure how the idea to have a ‘Bing Week’ came around – where the C Squared editorial team only used Bing for search, images, maps etc – but the honest motivation was to be able to ridicule it publicly at the end of the week. I am not sure why, but us journalists take a lot of pride in saying how rubbish something is and making sure that EVERYONE knows it! And sometimes you naturally fear and judge that which you do not know.

    So, on Monday we all switched our default search engine on our web browsers to Bing – naturally we all had Google. And in this first task we learned our first ‘Bingism’ – Mozilla really wants you to use Google and switching to Bing is not as straight forward as it could be. But we all got there eventually.

    The next task was finding out the time it is in Singapore. We are a global company so searching for time zones is something that we do often (it took a lot for me not to write ‘Googling for time zones’ by the way).

    When we searched ‘What time is it in Singapore’, the Bing result was a list of websites that could give the time:

    Bing Singapore search

    However we are all use to putting this search request into Google where the time appears above the search results: 

    Google Singapore search 

    But that’s hardly anything to moan about.

    Next was searching for images. Basically, Bing’s image search offering is awesome. Not only can you search for my beloved Oprah Winfrey but you can also then filter those searches by head and shoulder shots, ones where she is wearing red perhaps or even the layout of the image – square, wide, or tall (things that Google also offers) but there are small added bonuses that make Bing image search standout for me, such as, suggesting related people, suggesting related searches to Oprah and being able to look at my search history in a quick glance. 

    Oprah Bing search

    Next and perhaps the decider was the wholly grail of Google - Maps. I didn’t find much difference on the Bing map compared to Google’s except for the fact that it is considerably more detailed and I did miss Street View. Plus, I had to cheat once or twice and use Google Maps on my phone due to the lack of a Bing option. I am too new media to print out a map. 

    Google Maps 

     Bing search

    So what’s the verdict?

    I actually like Bing and I will not be switching my default browser back to Google: which is a big deal in my world!

    The truth is there really isn’t that much separating the two, search is search. And while they both have subtle differentiators at the end of the day they both deliver the same result. And while it does feel good to have one less Google influence in my life, I will miss making fun of @joewalton at Weber Shandwick for being an avid user of Bing because I am now one too ...

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Bing, Search, Google