This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Sponsorship

  • Never mind the results, feel the sponsorship

    05 February 2013

    On February 6 England will take to the field against Brazil. Two of the most feted names in world football will go head to head at Wembley. It’s a blue riband occasion and the perfect moment to assess the strength of ‘Brand England’ and its appeal to sponsors.

    In 2013 we are only three years away from hitting a half-century of hurt – 1966 was, as we are all too frequently reminded, the last time the team actually won a major tournament.  But does this lack of success actually impact on the commercial value of the brand?

    Last year England signed a new shirt deal with Nike worth a reported $45m a year (when other endorsements with Carlsberg, Lucozade, Mars, Nivea and Vauxhall are considered, Team England’s annual income from sponsorship is worth close to $100m).

    Compare that with Brazil, whose deal with the same supplier is worth just $20m. Even Spain, winners of the past three major tournaments, receives less from their shirt sponsor (in their case adidas) than the Three Lions.

    What then, is the unique appeal of Team England and how is it able to secure such lucrative contracts?

    The key lies not so much in the success (or lack of it) achieved by the team, but rather the audience that brands are able to reach through their sponsorship of England. Football indexes very highly against young males, a key, and difficult to reach, target group for many brands. The media cost of reaching this audience in the UK is extremely high and rights holders, such as the FA, are therefore able to charge a premium for their sponsorship deals.

    Strength of support obviously also plays a part, and in this regard England benefits from a fan base that is both extensive and remarkably resilient, both home and abroad. Football is the country’s national sport, and the fans appear to have a constant willingness to invest in and follow the team, despite repeated failures on the biggest stage.

    Research also shows that England enjoys a large global following, and that many football fans have adopted England as their ‘second team’.

    With further special matches to mark the FA’s 150th anniversary ahead and the team well placed to qualify for next year’s World Cup Finals, the picture continues to appear attractive for sponsors. The challenge now – as it has been for the last 47 years – is to do better once the players cross the white line.

    By Ed Wooller, head of consulting, Repucom UK & Ireland

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Sports, Sponsorship

  • Summer of sport: infographic

    27 June 2012

    With the UEFA Euro 2012 heading for the finish post and the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games creeping ever so quickly closer, Havas Sports & Entertainment have released some new research that highlights just how immense the public appetite is for sport.

    “The key outtake from this research is that despite the difficult economic conditions people are prioritising spending on sport as its popularity remains sky high,” says Havas Sports & Entertainment global president and chief executive Lucien Boyer. “To capitalise on this trend our aim is to help brands develop integrated campaigns at both a global and local level, in PR, social media and experiential activity backed by cutting-edge research.

    Check out the infographic below:

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Sports, Sponsorship

  • Let them drink beer!

    07 June 2012

    With the Euro 2012 competition about to kick-off this weekend, you would think that Carlsberg, as an official global beer sponsor of the tournament – would be sitting pretty cushty right now...

    Football and beer go hand in hand – in fact, it’s the only time I’ll ever drink it! But despite this massive sponsorship deal with the Euro 2012 tournament, it won’t be Carlsberg that is the lager of choice for football fans while watching the beautiful game – but rival Stella Artois...

    According to a survey of 1500 UK men, carried out by TolunaQuick, Stella Artois will be their tipple of choice after being voted the top lager brand for Euro 2012 with 14.7% of the vote. Carlsberg, meanwhile, has been relegated to fifth place with just 9% of the vote...

    Top 10 lager and ale brands for Euro 2012

    1. Stella Artois                        14.7%
    2. Carling                                13.2%
    3. Fosters                               12.0%
    4. Budweiser                           9.3%
    5. Carlsberg                           9.0%
    6. Guinness                             6.9%
    7. Old Speckled Hen               4.0%
    8. Peroni                                 3.9%
    9. John Smiths                         3.7%
    10. Kronenberg                       3.2%

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: Sports, Advertising, Sponsorship

  • Is it really worth sponsoring the Olympics?

    07 June 2012

    The Olympics – a major international sporting event that comes around every four years. It’s no wonder that brands are keen to pay big bucks to get involved...

    But is it really worth forking out all that cash? What value do brands really get out of it?

    I came across some research earlier from Opinium Research, who has been keeping a close eye on not only this year’s official Olympic sponsors, but also the brands that have no connection with the Games, but that are benefiting from it.

    A survey of 2,000 people in the UK showed that only 10% of Brits are aware that BMW is an official Olympics partner. McDonald’s and Coca-Cola came out on top as the most recognised Olympic sponsors, with almost half of the UK aware that they are partners, with the awareness growing even more as we get closer to the London 2012 Olympic Games. Coca-Cola, in fact, has seen the biggest increase of 10 points between January and April.

    But what is more interesting is that while brands pay a lot of money to be associated with the Olympics, those that aren’t involved are mistakenly getting credit from the public.

    A fifth (22%) of Brits mistakenly believe that EDF’s rival British Gas is a partner to the Olympics. Meanwhile, Visa, British Airways, Lloyds TSB and Coca-Cola may not be so happy to find that their biggest rivals Mastercard (20%), Virgin Atlantic (18%), HSBC (14%) and Pepsi (11%) are thought of as being partners to the Olympics. 

    It’s clear that the big global brands among us – such as McDonald’s and Coca-Cola – have a lot to gain from sponsoring a major sporting event such as the Olympics, but, as this latest research shows, maybe you don’t have to fork out the big bucks to increase brand awareness.

    See also: Brands hit the right note - a recent piece we did with the official sponsors of the MTV EMAs to see what they got out of sponsoring an international event.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: brand awareness, Sponsorship, Olympics

  • A moral compass that points two ways

    04 July 2011

    Nike is a company that bases its strategy on the celebrating the cult of the individual. This strategy has brought with it plenty of success, not only did it triumph at last year’s FIFA World Cup, but it also ranks as the most valuable sports brand in Interbrand’s top 100. However, by elevating the status of the individual also comes risks.

    Nike are the sponsors of adulterous Tiger Woods, who shattered his family image when it emerged he’d picked up a host of extra-curricular friends as he travelled the world with his golf bag providing the perfect alibi.

    They also backed one of the NBA’s biggest stars in the shape of the LA Lakers’ Kobe Bryant who faced the long wrangle of a court case over allegations of sexual assault.

    And the Tour de Force of the Tour de France, Lance Armstrong always found it difficult to shake the stench of unproven allegations over performance enhancing drugs.

    But the case of Michael Vick is a special one. Not only because he was convicted and jailed for arranging underground dog fighting, but also because unusually Nike didn’t stand by their man, dropping him with a verbal barrage.

    For the uninitiated, here’s just a quick peek at the rap sheet that Vick met in court:

    -  Hanging dogs with a wooden plank between two trees

    -  Drowning dogs by placing their heads in a five gallon bucket of water

    -  Breaking the back and necks of dogs by slamming them into the ground several times

    -  Shooting dogs with handgun

    -  Electrocuting dogs at a property owned purely for the purposes of arranging dog fights.

    M&M is all for giving second chances and trusting in the rehabilitative powers of prison, but to swing so wildly between the two – acting with moral outrage only to later champion the resurrection of a fallen hero (and undoubtedly relishing the notion that all publicity is good publicity) – is hypocrisy of the highest order.

    Expect the next Nike sports watch to come with a compass that points both north and south.

    They should also be ashamed if produce any more ads like this

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Josh Colley

    Tags: Reputation, Talent, Sponsorship

  • The power of celebrity endorsements

    10 May 2011

    Social media’s growing prominence has helped increase the potency of celebrity endorsements.

    That’s the verdict of the delegates at the Festival of Media Global in Montreux. The result of the straw poll was met with surprise by Brian Wallace, vice-president, digital marketing and media, RIM.

    Wallace, who had early expressed his belief that agencies needed to focus more on digital measurement, said: “I’ve yet seen any data that suggest celebrity endorsements actually work.”

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Sponsorship

  • Olympic Security Woes

    11 March 2011

    Forget broadcast rights and doping scandals all everyone at the Global Sports Forum in Barcelona wants to talk about is security.

    Following the recent terrorist attack in Moscow - Dmitry Chernyshenko, president, Organizing Committee Sochi 2014 - was asked how he was going to guarantee that the Games would be safe. His response was a bold one: “Sochi will be the safest place for the Games ever.”

    When the same question was poised to Carlos Nuzman, president, Organizing Committee Rio 2016 his response was: “My number one issue will always be transport, and then security. It is transport, not security, that will leave a legacy after the Games.”

    Despite his initial statement of guaranteeing safety, Chernyshenko’s later sentiment is perhaps the most realistic: “Nobody is protected in the world against terrorist attacks. We are doing all we can to ensure a safe Olympics.”

    Is there much more that any Organizing Committee can do?

    You can also follow M&M’s experience at the event on Twitter @mandmglobal and right here on the blog.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Sponsorship

  • Whose name is on your balls?

    10 March 2011

    Adidas’ senior vice president global sports marketing Jocelyn Robiot is not sure that Adidas would be able to walk away from its 40-year partnership with UEFA without some major regrets.

    “You don’t want to see someone else’s name on your balls,” said Robiot at the Global Sports Forum in Barcelona. “This partnership is a little different because we are friends and football is a part of our DNA.”

    You can keep up to date with M&M’s coverage of the Global Sports Forum by following @mandmglobal on Twitter.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Sponsorship

  • Supporting the dissidents

    03 November 2010

    The M&M team loves “sticking it to the man” whenever we can. If there is a coup going on somewhere in the world we aim to be in the thick of it. Strikes? We are all for them!

    So news that the Manchester United Supporters Trust (MUST) has managed to bag an official sponsor for its alternative team shirt is right up our alley – and that is not because two-thirds of the M&M Team actually supports Manchester United.

    The fan pressure group is looking to force a change of ownership of the club away from the Glazer Family which has left the club with a £700m ($1.1bn) debt, following its takeover of the premier league side.

    The electronics manufacturer sponsored Manchester United from 1982 to 2000 and will now be the official sponsor of the alternative green and gold team shirt that MUST supporters wear. The proceeds from the sale of the shirts will go to the Prostate Cancer Charity and are on sale globally.

    MUST is aiming to take revenue away from the Glazers by encouraging fans to buy its shirts instead. According to a spokesperson for the group said they are aiming to make existing sponsors and potential sponsors pick between the fans and the glazers.

    This puts brands in an interesting position. Considering how much attention MUST and their cause is getting why not sponsor the fans? It will probably cost an advertiser much less than an official sponsorship with United.

     

    MUST protest    

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Sponsorship

  • What!?! Murdoch isn’t a Commie Loving Lefty?

    18 August 2010

     Rupert Murdoch

    To my shock and horror it was revealed today that Rupert Murdoch’s New Corporation donated $1m to the Republican Governors Association (RGA) in the US. I don’t know about you but I never saw News Corporation as the type – you know, Conservative leaning.

    The donation will support the candidates running in the up and coming November elections.

    Understandably this donation has come under fire due Murdoch’s mammoth influence on the US and for that matter the international media landscape.

    The executive director of the Democratic Governors Association, Nathan Daschle, has been quoted as calling the donation “stunning”, mostly due to the fact that Murdoch’s Fox News runs under the slogan “fair and balanced”.

    However, News Corp has rebuffed the criticism: “News Corporation believes in the power of free markets and organisations like the RGA, which have a pro-business agenda, support our priorities at this most critical time for our economy,” said Jack Horner, vice-president of corporate affairs and communications at News Corporation in New York.

    All jokes a side, it is one thing for Murdoch to donate money to political organisations in his name but an international corporation with the remit of delivering “fair and balanced” news is a whole other matter.

    I would love to see how Bill O’Reilly would push this through his ‘No Spin Zone’.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Online, Print, TV, Sponsorship

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Next page